At the cellular level, you and everyone will see amazingly complex procedures, including procedures for energy production, gene expression, immune response, DNA reproduction, neural communication, protein synthesis, photosynthesis, to mention only some. At a higher level, we will have strategies for vision, locomotion, digestion, reproduction and of course data processing aka nerves and mind. Still higher, life exhibits interactions between individual living things, so wolves hunt jointly, moms care for off-spring, distinct species form symbiotic connections, and of course individuals create sophisticated social structures and cultures.
For all these facets of life, science has delved deeply to how such complexity could arise. Evolution stands as the fundamental synthesis of the investigation, and gives logic on how what is more complicated and complicated can arise from what is less complicated and intricate. Astronomy, not always intentionally, provides a background for development. The subject of astronomy has revealed that all these worlds probably, most likely, exist the development of complex life has basically innumerable opportunities to occur. So science, and secular thought, and contemporary investigation, have demonstrated to a high degree of certainly the non-necessity of Intelligent Design.
Complex life can arise with no external, conscious entity directing the procedure. Now, some could nevertheless, even moderately, disagree. So, at least for this particular discussion, we will suspend the controversy, and take as a supposition, recognized or not, that development and other characteristics of natural, non-Deity-directed character can create the complexity of life observed on Earth and you could try here https://humdes.info/generator/. That leaves another question. Did complex life in Reality arise from evolution? We are suspending controversy and, willingly or unwillingly, agreeing that Intelligent Design is not necessary. Does that make it non-operative? Have we proven it cannot or did not occur?
A little logic can help here. Intelligent design states if a, complicated life, then a designer and manufacturer of the complexity must exist. The majority of us have probably heard the watchmaker analogy, i.e. if a person discovers a watch, then that implies a watchmaker. But development provides an alternative to the watchmaker analogy, and explains that if, development, then complex life. Soak, complicated life, can appear absent. But just such a tacit assumption on the excellence and singularity of Humanity’s intelligence lies under our belief in evolution. For without such As assumption, we cannot discard the hypothesis of fib Intelligent Designer, then complicated life. We have proven for most that Intelligent Design is not necessary and for this discussion are assuming it. But we have not proven that it is not sufficient, nor have we proven the non-existence of an operative superior intelligence.